Abstract
The authors study the content of a specialist's opinion (review): a currently popular expert opinion evaluation method. It is noted that the name "review" does not fully refl ect the essence and content of the document prepared by a specialist based on an analysis of an expert opinion. The authors study in detail the content of specialist's analytical activities, mention the competence limits. The author suggests the structure of a specialist's opinion and notes some problems arising in the course of its use in the proving process. The paper arrives at a conclusion about the need to develop methodological recommendations for carrying out an analytical study of an expert opinion by a specialist.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
