Abstract
The purpose of the work is to find out how plants react to such zones and whether their phytoindication is possible. Two territories of the Perm territory were studied: the Vishersky Nature Reserve and forests near Perm. The research methodology included lineament and geostructurometric analysis of space images and special maps using ring structures discovered on the Earth’s surface by Yu. I. Fivenskii, as well as phyto- and bioindication of small geoactive zones. It was found that in the forests near Perm favorable zones of such zones occupy 1.44% of the territory and within their limits the safety of common pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) is 29–42 times higher. Phytoindication of small geoactive zones of 1.0 and 3.0 m by common pine was shown in the zones of influence of these zones: 0–18 cm — the radius of inhibition with the absence of trees; 19–29 cm — the depression zone with small trees; 30–48 cm — the comfort zone with medium and large trees. Two types of networks formed by zones of 1.0 and 8.0 m in size near Perm (on the plain) and in the reserve (in the mountains) were compared. In the mountains, with high geodynamic activity of territories, the networks are oriented in one direction, while on the plain their orientation is misaligned by 30°. In the reserve, large trees of Siberian spruce (Picea obovata Ledeb.) were located on small geoactive zones of 1.0 and 8.0 m, and trees of Siberian pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) — on zones 1.0 and 3.0 m in combination with zones 16, 32 and 55 m. In the subgolets zone, ring structures of perennial plants were also found on the first two types of zones. In addition, along the edges of the swamps, chains of trees were found whose direction coincides with ring faults, and the chains themselves are similar to the structure of small geoactive zones networks, and this fractality requires field verification. The hypothesis recharge of plants within geoactive zones is proposed, which also explains the successful growth of trees on rocks, where the amount of available soil is minimal.
Highlights
Введение Изучение лесных экосистем методами космогеологических исследований с использованием фитоиндикации, которая отражает комплексное воздействие глубинных энергий Земли различной природы, позволило установить целый ряд новых явлений, приоткрывающих сложные взаимосвязи между неотектоникой и структурой лесных насаждений [1,2,3]
Обширные территории отличаются по степени неотектонической активности, которая, в свою очередь, определяет активность и миграцию малых геоактивных зон (МГА-зон) с размерами метры – первые десятки метров
Местоположение патогенных зон Хартмана сейчас определяют уже не только биолокацией, но и техническими методами контроля, в частности, наложением на сеть Хартмана фотоматериалов и получением четких изображений полос этой сети и ее узлов [4]
Summary
Введение Изучение лесных экосистем методами космогеологических исследований с использованием фитоиндикации, которая отражает комплексное воздействие глубинных энергий Земли различной природы, позволило установить целый ряд новых явлений, приоткрывающих сложные взаимосвязи между неотектоникой и структурой лесных насаждений [1,2,3]. Результаты и обсуждение В начале рассмотрим влияние благоприятных МГА-зон размером 1,0 и 3,0 м на рост деревьев сосны.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
